Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paulo Kirk's avatar

Ahh, Sugar. And, those dancing fake scientists, those paid by "you-know-who" will shill for cigarettes or sugar or DDT or, well, you get the Snake Oil Salesmanship of Disaster-Choatic-Predatory-Psychopath-Usury-War Capitalism.

Turbo cancers and the Jab? And, alas, sugar helps the world go obese and the cancer that keeps on giving.

However, another scientific snake oil lie is that WE are mostly responsible for cancers and nervous diseases and autoimmune diseases and other maladies. WRONG.

Tens of thousands of chemical in the food, directly or indirectly, and then in the air, water, etc. You think the precautionary principle and at first do no harm has a lock down on all chemical coming from the Complex? One studied? Let alone two or 10 or 100? And what about how the syngergy of chem a does with chem b, c, d, e?

Sugar.

Evidence from plant remnants and DNA suggests that sugarcane evolved in South East Asia. Researchers are currently hunting for early evidence of sugarcane cultivation at the Kuk Swamp in Papua New Guinea, where the domestication of related crops such as taro and banana dates back to approximately 8,000BC. The crop spread around the Eastern Pacific and Indian Oceans around 3,500 years ago, carried by Austronesian and Polynesian seafarers.

The first chemically refined sugar appeared on the scene in India about 2,500 years ago. From there, the technique spread east towards China, and west towards Persia and the early Islamic worlds, eventually reaching the Mediterranean in the 13th century. Cyprus and Sicily became important centres for sugar production. Throughout the Middle Ages, it was considered a rare and expensive spice, rather than an everyday condiment.

The first place to cultivate sugarcane explicitly for large-scale refinement and trade was the Atlantic island of Madeira, during the late 15th century. Then, it was the Portuguese who realised that new and favourable conditions for sugar plantations existed in Brazil, where a slave-based plantation economy was established. When Brazilian sugarcane was introduced in the Caribbean, shortly before 1647, it led to the growth of the industry which came to feed the sugar craze of Western Europe.

THINK Slave trade.

Now? Right, a CRISPR and mRNA and EMF for every occasion.

And, then, what about ACES -- adverse childhood experience/event/trauma?

Yeah, Nakba, the gift that is 76 years old and counting.

While the Wailing Wall White House Zyklon Blinken shit storms in Kiev -- with a few hundred special ops protecting his criminal ass.

Good on you, Cindy, for the hard work. For black men, it's called weathering. Other blacks, including women? Weathering. Add to that the magic potients -- sugar, fat, salt, nanoparticles, emulsifiers, and the entire suite of addictive things those "scientists" help those "chosen" millionaire and billionaire companies COOK up.

Racial differences in weathering and its associations with psychosocial stress: The CARDIA study:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595283/

+--+

My clients living with developmental/intellectual/psychological disabilities certainly get hooked on the foods, the bad ones, and way too many. Anxiety, fear, psychological warfare fromt he Mad Men and Mad Women whose DNA goes back to Edward "Chief Murderers of 20th Century" Bernays.

https://paulokirk.substack.com/p/screwed-by-the-jews-in-the-wailing

Speaking of that Zyklon Blinken and his Protection Racket -- listen to his so so bad voice and guitar.

Expand full comment
Ort's avatar

I'm glad you broke out of the tailspin and are feeling better. I admit that I hoped that the "YUGE victory" was that the dastardly pro-scamdemic organization belatedly came crawling back to admit that you were right and they were wrong, and to beg forgiveness.

Of course, that would be too much to expect. And at least you've got your health, which is generally considered to be The Most Important Thing. 😉

___________________________________________________

The Pelosi "hammer-attack intruder" episode gives me the fantods. For me, it's one of those controversial open questions that eventually are nominally "resolved", but not in a way that is really satisfying-- at least not to hardened skeptics like Your Humble Commenter. 🤨

I have long known that whenever a well-connected person or organization, especially a political person or organization, gets caught in some sordid contretemps, a diverse cadre of "fixers" is mobilized to put an innocuous, or less sensational, spin on the initial reports. The Pelosi family, currently prospering servants of Mammon, have both the money and power to sanitize their ugly lapses. 👿 💰

Still, I foolishly hoped that the criminal trial would expose the original elements of the "attack" that didn't add up, to an extent that disrupted the usual cover-up.

I admit I haven't followed the story closely, but it seems as if the whitewashed narrative has prevailed: the utterly creepy Paul Pelosi was an entirely innocent victim of a home invasion and a savage assault by a classic deranged Lone Nut. The "proof", as with the January 6th "insurrectionists", is that the alleged perp was convicted and has been given a draconian sentence. This puts the official narrative of his criminal behavior beyond question. (FWIW, I'm not equating Pelosi's peculiar alleged attacker with the hapless and substantially innocent "insurrectionists".)

It might be the persistence of my stubborn confirmation bias, but I still ain't buying it. 😠

___________________________________________________

On a trivial Grammar Nanny note: I always use the chronological sort order for comments threads; for me, it's like preferring to sit facing front on public transit. "Newest first" feels like facing backwards, and I despise the popularity contest "best" sort order.

I share this digressive point of order only to note that recently, Substack inexplicably changed the "Chronological" label to "Oldest First". Maybe they explained why somewhere, but I wonder if it's another manifestation of The Dumbing of Amerika. That is, was the problem that too many readers were perplexed and confused by "chronological", since they didn't know what it meant? Enquiring minds want to know! 🤔

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts