Why Elon Musk's "X" is a Hellscape With the New CEO, Linda Yaccarino's CENSORSHIP Plans

She May Not Be unLawful, but She's Definitely Awful

TWO CENSORSHIP GHOULS

X from an Xer Paul Mitchell

Paul Mitchell

@PaulMitchell_AB

·

22h

X CEO Linda Yaccarino: "we've introduced a new policy called... 'freedom of speech, not reach'... if you're going to post something that is lawful but it's awful you get labelled... you get deamplified." X is now officially and explicitly a censorship platform.

What Yaccarino is saying here with “freedom of speech, not reach” means a person will be able to say whatever he/she wants to say, but no one will get to see it, if the truly awful person thinks the speech “awful.”

“Deamplified.” Orwellian for “violating First Amendment rights to free speech.”

I don’t tweet or “X” but I keep up with the appalling censorship on social media platforms. When I was still Facebooking, I was banned for seven/twelve months in 2021—I was banned on January 6th and January 20 (when Sloppy Joe had his ridiculously Covid-ish inauguration). I was banned when the Democraps suddenly became born-again vax-aholics, after they were “anti-vax conspiracy theorists” when Trump was the King of the Vaccine. Anyway, I was banned a lot. I detoxed from Fascistbook when I opened this Substack.

As someone who is highly suspicious of war criminal profiteers, I didn’t expect much from Musk’s hostile purchase of Twitter. However, Elon Musk's "X" had been a popular social media platform, vibrant with free speech, as it was based on an idea to let people express their opinions without any limitations: That promise went away early, but especially during the great Covid purge of people and accounts who didn’t follow the establishment’s agit-crap around the scamdemic.

However, the recent announcement of the WEF ghoul Linda Yaccarino as the new CEO has created more controversy. Yaccarino has promised to censor "lawful but awful" content, which has sparked outrage among free speech advocates. This article is not only about Linda Yaccarino's appointment but also an analysis of how elites like the World Economic Forum (WEF) and billionaire businessmen like Musk are trying to control people's speech. Additionally, it highlights why billionaires shouldn't own social media or legacy media as it could be harmful to the principles of democracy around the world.

JERK-FACE WEF GHOUL, LINDA YACCARINO

Linda Yaccarino's recent appointment as CEO has created chaos, as one of her initial statements was to censor "lawful but awful content." For a platform that was built with the principle of free speech, this announcement came as a shock to many users. Critics have rightfully denounced this move as an attempt to control the content on the platform. Yaccarino was reportedly in the World Economic Forum, which is a gathering of the global elite that aims to shape the world's future. It is hard not to wonder if the WEF had a role in her appointment and whether she is a part of their agenda to control internet freedom. Besides, who determines “awful” speech? We go down a slippery slope when we allow anyone to be the dictator of speech. I have had people I trust try to dictate my speech, and it makes me trust them less, can you imagine someone like Yaccarino who has proven to be untrustworthy telling us what is “awful” speech? Peace? Freedom? Health? Anti-government ranting?

Even unintelligible speech is protected. Go, Shanga Koala!

The World Economic Forum has been on a massive campaign to control what people say on the internet. They have been promoting the concept of "cybercrime" as a justification for governments to control the internet. They illegally believe that it is their duty to shape the internet, and they want to persuade governments to regulate speech under the guise of protecting people. These efforts are dangerous because they might be a threat to democracy, as free speech is essential for democracy to thrive.

The combination of billionaires like Elon Musk owning social media platforms and the WEF's agenda to control internet freedom is a recipe for disaster for free speech advocates. Billionaires like Musk and Jeff Bezos owning legacy media or social media is not something we should welcome. The concentration of media power in the hands of a few wealthy individuals results in limitations, especially on the ideas and voices of those who don't share the views of the billionaire owners. This situation can have a disastrous effect on the diversity of ideas and voices that can be spoken.

The problem of billionaires owning social media is not limited to just one platform. It affects the entire social media industry. For example, Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, has been accused of censorship multiple times. Jack Dorsey, the former CEO of Twitter, was always in the headlines for enforcing censorship. When social media is in the hands of billionaires, it is almost inevitable that their personal views, priorities, and agendas might be reflected in their platforms' policies and rules.

In conclusion, Elon Musk's "X" is taking a dangerous turn with the new CEO Linda Yaccarino's censorship plans. The appointment raises questions about whether she is just a small part of the broader agenda of the global elite, the World Economic Forum, to control the internet content. The combination of billionaires owning social media platforms and the WEF's agenda to control internet freedom is worrisome for free speech advocates. In the future, we must closely monitor how this strategy works and support free and open communication platforms that promote autonomy, free speech, and openness. Billionaires should not own social media or legacy media. It is harmful to democracy around the globe.

That’s what I think, what do you think?

---

WE TRULY NEED YOUR FINANCIAL GIFTS:

We have different tiers of support: $5/month; $50/year, or $100 as a founding member.

Checks/money/orders/cash/etc can be snail-mailed to:

Cindy Sheehan’s Soapbox, LLC
PO BOX 6264, VACAVILLE, CA 95696

PayPal: cindysheehanssoapbox@gmail.com