Golly Darnit
POTUS Immunity Upheld by SCOTUS
CASEY SHEEHAN KIA IRAQ 04/04/04
Without going into deep legal detain and Sotomayor’s unhinged dissent, I was really crossing my fingers that SCOTUS would not uphold POTUS immunity for actions included in their constitutional powers.
I was hoping this so I could immediately file charges/suit against George Bush for murdering my son and over one-million others in his illegal assault on Iraq/Afghanistan.
I don’t know what shitlibs are so upset about. I mean Obama, among so many war crimes and crimes against humanity, extra-judicially killed two American citizens (the al-Awlakis) in Yemen. He is immune. Jerky Joe doesn’t even know what he is doing, except, perhaps between 10-4 EDT (the part time POTUS) and he is immune. They are all immune and they all commit war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Anyway, I was hoping to turn my skinny retirement into a phat one and, even more importantly, getting #Justice4Casey and all the others.
We have different tiers of support: $5/month; $50/year, or $100 as a founding member.
Checks/money/orders/cash/etc can be SNAIL-mailed to:
Cindy Sheehan’s Soapbox, LLC
PO BOX 6264, VACAVILLE, CA 95696
PayPal: cindysheehanssoapbox@gmail.com
Y’all know how much I love me my coffee
MEME OF THE DAY:
Jeff Childers in his “Coffee and Covid “ post analyzing the decision said far from excusing what presidents do acting as commander in chief they make them accountable when they step outside their constitutional authority granted by the Constitution. So for instance the droning of the citizens you point out is now subject to this test; does the president have the authority to murder citizens, even when they say supposedly bad things? No, so a legal case can be brought against him for all his extrajudicial droning. Was dingbat W allowed to order torture of anyone under the terms of his oath of office? Can something be found from the administrations of the past 20 years where a president or a member of his administration stepped outside their constitutional limits? Before there was a de facto gentlemen’s agreement to not prosecute them. The current crop of democrats who must please their donors who want “results dammit!”, never thought through the consequences of lawfare against their opponents. They really didn’t take into account that just maybe the issue would come before the supremes and they would put every administration under the microscope. The idiot shitlibs threw the boomerang and then went back to scouring their social media. Oh but don’t celebrate too soon trumpers, did HE do any stuff outside the constitutional limits of his office? Hmmm, didn’t he drone a certain Iranian general? Was this general part of the military of a nation we are at war with? Does the constitution grant authority to the president to just kill foreigners, even foreigners who are really bad in their view? Ok, now for the current president. Did he order basically every working person in this country to get a shot, even if they didn’t want it? Was that part of his constitutional authority? Were people injured as a result? Never mind the criminal nature of this what about the civil cases? Sorry Joe you are getting OJ-ed. Don’t cry too hard when they tow your ‘Vette away. My analysis may be overly optimistic, I mean it’s still going to be criminals ( they may not be criminal yet but are aspirational for their turn) prosecuting criminals. I would love to see what a President RFK could do with this. Oh wait, I know, all you perfectionists out there will claim to know that he’s just going to be like everyone else.
Cindy, Jeff over at Coffee and Covid has a nuanced take on that ruling today that actually may open former Presidents to charges. I tried to share the link for the post but could not. I hope it helps.