I am so over that voting for lesser of two evils thing. Not sure if I'll even vote again--still debating on it. I literally don't like any of the candidates running.
Many interesting points raised. On accountability for the handling of the "pandemic," I believe other commenters accurately stated that RFK Jr. has publicly been critical of it. For me, the issue is that he peaked in 2021 during the giant Berlin protest and has faded somewhat since, to the point where now he's not a leading voice (as far as I know) aggressively blasting the ramping up of ANOTHER cycle of masking, distancing, injection bullying and/or mandates. This is happening now, in real time, while he's an active candidate. As far as holding Fauci to individual account, he wrote the book on that, but is that the biggest issue? I believe Sam might be underplaying the confirmed or not virus issue. People like Sam, Cindy, probably most here are probably "awake" enough to realize that whether or not there was an actual new, unknown pathogen, everything that followed its "discovery" has been a disastrous tragedy, and the huge majority would have "followed orders" just from the official proclamations and fear porn. But just "knowing" this after the fact seems a little too blase, and potentially dangerous. I look at "The Virus" as somewhat equivalent to the "19 Muslims with box cutters." The direct or proximate causes of their respective "events." Referring to September 2001, we can talk forever about "negligent" security before the event, "negligent" and "inept" procedures and policies after it, "coverups" of faulty, inept and negligent personnel throughout. Etc. That's a different animal than, "There were no 19 Muslims with box cutters" who were the cause in the first place. Same here. If there's a question of what really happened in the first place, then what can be gained in pursuing "we'll never let what we don't know what happened happen again?" I guess I am not truly resigned to the "made in a lab" conclusion after seeing how that has (relatively) quickly gone from sacrilege/blasphemy/unallowable lie and misinformation to "mainstream" acceptance. As for the "unreliable" (putting it mildly) testing, I don't doubt that Sam's "positive" results coincided with his not feeling well. There have been enough public testimonies (athletes, entertainers, etc.) of testing "positive" when they no longer felt unwell, or when they never felt sick at all. The test's coincidentally dead (3-4 months ahead of time) inventor repeatedly said the test was NOT a valid diagnostic tool -- and he said it prominently, contradicting Fauci et al. during the AIDS phenomenon.
Biowarfare... Never worked. Chemical weapons do work. Sasha Latypova covers this well.
If anything, what they claim is biological is really the result of latent toxicity that doesn't kill instantly.
Testing doesn't prove it was caused by a virus. Whatever genetic code patterns they're looking for can happen by getting sick via other means. You know how they say virus genes are a part of our body genes? Bingo... because it's the result of damaged cells with broken DNA etc.
Also, how can one be convinced it is different than the flu? I've had horrible flus as a kid (probably from the doctor checkup 💉) where I was almost hospitalized. I got sick during this crap and yeah my taste was weird, but I also remembered my taste got weird in the past too.
Maybe that's why the predator class is so effective. They hammer the word "novel" coronavirus and people are convinced it's something new.
Sorry Sam, the death rates were no different in 2020 vs past years in most nations. Also, what kind of new engineered thing has an average age of death above the life expectancy? Oh yeah, remdesevir and ventilators .... 😂
I don't see how rfk is not addressing the pandemic.... He's addressing health in general in order to point out the reason why we are in this mess.
Not saying he's anti vax is smart because like Aaron Siri says, show us a safe vaccine by the proper trial data.... There's none. But it's a great way to lead in as someone who lets the people see the truth from the machine itself. The ones convinced about safe vaccines will have to face the reality from the captured agencies own lack of proof lol.
Ending autoimmune disease... just stop vaccinations. That's why he brings up safety testing. If it's not proven safe, it's ended. Simple. No new laws needed, because they violated the 86 nvic act by not filing safety reports.
Sam, you sound like you're brainwashed. Fixing the healthcare system doesn't require forcing people to stop smoking or stop eating big macs etc. It just requires following the laws, stopping false claims and shady practices that are allowed of the full of bullshit that doctors, food companies, and big pharma industries. Even if the people still smoke or eat big macs, at least it'll have the fraction of toxic crap it has today if they had to follow basic health and safety... not this known crooked system that ignores it's own regulations.
I do agree with Sam and you about the middle east. Rfk sounds straight up brainwashed by his own culture to believe that nation is innocent at all costs. It's quite odd from a man that's been pretty open minded to learn that shots cause the big A, or that the 3 letter agency killed his uncle and likely his father.
Personally, I think that we can't rely on any politicians. We, the people, need to come together and create change. Change needs to come from the bottom, from us. No hero is going to save us.
Great interview! I hope you will have him on again. I just read the transcript, and it seemed to end too soon... I guess I'm desperate for this kind of conversation. Right now, I'm trying to talk to "Covidian cult members," i.e., my friends who think I'm a conspiracy theorist... But they're nice people--too nice and too naive. So I don't try to convince them that there was a scamdemic anymore. I try talking with them about other things, like mass surveillance, 5G radiation, endless war, economic inequality, etc. Often I can find common ground that way.
As far as whether or not the virus exists, I too had strange symptoms over a year ago. But after learning more about 5G, I've been intrigued to discover that the symptoms of 5G radiation exposure are the same as the Covid symptoms. Hmm... Also during lockdowns, there was a massive effort to erect those 5G towers, and they're all over the country now, even in rural areas!
So my own opinion--could be right/could be wrong--is that "Covid" was actually environmentally induced, not from a virus but from emf's or maybe directed energy weapons. May sound crazy to some, but when you look into the effects of emf's you'll maybe see my point.
Also cases of the flu have magically disappeared since the scamdemic, so... was it just a strain of the flu, perhaps augmented by excess emf radiation?
But in any case, there's no point in arguing whether the virus exists or not. We need to find a way to bring people together and see that the richest of the rich are turning the whole world into a prison. They're turning a shopping mall outside of Buffalo, NY into a living center--sort of a manufactured village. My guess is it'll be a "smart" village.
Anyone who fails to see the enormous personal courage RFK Jr. has demonstrated, given his family's history and his bold stands on several vital issues, is too cynical for me.Yes, there are some things where we would like him to be even bolder, and that may evolve as he learns more and the campaign advances. But those who raise scathing criticisms are essentially saying we have to vote for Mr. Awful or Mr. Terrible or some lessers of little note. Right now he is the best VIABLE candidate we have.
I am not sure what "personal courage" has to do with anything? And are YOU really bringing up to ME that if we don't vote for Kennedy then we HAVE to vote for Biden or Trump? Are YOU really making that argument after all your years of Green Party activism? "Cynical" means: I am uncomfortable with confronting your principles, so I just don't want to hear them. Jon, I have heard these EXACT same arguments since I didn't fall for the Obama mystique, then Hillary, then Biden. Oh, and also Sanders. I won't be shamed or blamed for expressing different opinions to anyones. I am not cynical, I am a realist---and if YOU admire personal courage so much, what about mine? Does my courage in losing a son, then battling the very Empire that Bobby and his family are part of count for anything. Can't I state an opinion, or have guests, because I have a lot of "personal courage" without being called names? I don't give a rats ass who anyone votes for, or doesn't vote for--if my content offends you, then don't read it, or listen to it. It's as simple as that. Oh, by the way, my "personal courage" was never backed by the safety net of tens of millions of dollars in the bank, or by a family with unlimited funds (and scandals). I was never a heroin addict, even after all of the terrible things that happened to me. So, really "personal courage." Um, okay.
Oh Wow Cindy! I was referencing Sam's comment. Of course I know your tragic story very well and have respected you for years. Of course personal courage counts, yours as well as Kennedy's. As I have been saying, the choice "they" offer to us is between Mr. Awful and Mr. Terrible, but of course we can vote for others who will likely not even get 5%, which is what I have been doing for years. But the reality is that if Kennedy is not on the ballot, we will continue down this suicidal path. He may be able to at least shift direction.
Obama, Biden,and Sanders were still within the imperial orbit. RFK, Jr, takes inspiration from JFK's intent to "Break the CIA into 1000 pieces and scatter it to the wind." Very different from the sheepdogs. I don't buy you "definition" of cynical, Cindy, and if what I wrote offended you, I deeply apologize. Not my intent at all. As you know from prior comments, we are mostly on the same. page. With respect and aloha always, Jon
Can you explain to me a strategy that will do anything BUT demolish Kennedy's campaign--forgetting all of the terrible things/scandals ALL those major Kennedys (including Jr) have been involved in? Where do you see this going? Are you, and many others, wearing Rose Colored glasses and having nostalgia for a different time that wasn't all that rosy anyway? I would really like someone to explain it adequately to me without name calling. So far, on this thread it's been "cynical" and "harsh" and "divisive."
OK, Thanks for this invitation. We rarely know consequences in advance. We can AIM,with intent,and that is what he is doing. He has said he wants military bases dismantled and a retreat from Empire America to become a respected country. I honor that. His campaign can help defeat the cynicism that is APPROPRIATE regarding the current state of affairs, but on the other side acts to stifle the civic upheaval necessary to make real change. As I have often said, "Despair is not a wining strategy." Same with cynicism, which has the positive side of demonstrating lack of trust in those who claim to "lead" us, but negative like mud that prevents forward motion. Look at the call to occupy Zuccotti Park a dozen years ago! Who knew that it would inspire a worldwide movement or resistance to empire? Here's a gy who is making 9/11 and covid truths the centerpiece of his campaign--and just doing that enters them into the campaign mix of concepts.
No one can articulate how RFK is actually going to win, not even RFk. That is a huge problem. He seemed pretty much in despair when he FINALLY realized the DNC is garbage.
I think focusing on US electoral politics is a losing strategy and prevents us in the working-poor classes to organize a revolutionary strategy for change. And, this thread has once again proven Sam's assertion.
Yes, it has finally sunk in how terribly corrupt DNC is, so he will have to run 3rd party or Independent, and he can draw on disaffected folks for the corporate parties but especially those of he 40% who are not aligned with either Demagogues or Repugnants.
Honestly, it doesn't make any difference who we vote for. Even if RFK should be "picked" by the Dems--out of desperation--he would be controlled by the MIC. If he tried to do anything different he would get the same treatment as his father and uncle. Haven't we learned that by now???
Also, people act like they want their favorite candidate to be tyrants. For example, absent tyranny of some sort, how will Bobby "end autoimmune diseases?"
Cindy, I share your blog at times. I worked with you in Texas, the tour to DC and in DC. I will not share this as I think you both are stuck in your own prejudices and are damaging the best chance this country has to end the living hell around us. If you can't support RFK Jr., then just keep quiet and stop damaging his chances. Trump is a sick child in a 76-year-old body. For God's sake can't you see this?
And, yes, this is my platform. Not yours. Not RFK's. Not Trump's. Mine.
If it is not meeting your high requirements, then you are free to leave.
It would be dumb to leave, but that's totally up to you. No one is forcing you to be here, and no one is forcing you to vote, or not vote, for anybody.
RFK says a lot of good things. I listened to him a lot back in 2020, and his book about Fauci helped me to get others to "wake up." However, he isn't going to save us. No politician is at this point. We, the people, need to come together and find solutions and stop looking up to these heroes to save us. I like a lot of what RFK says (except about Israel, of course) but essentially, he is just another millionaire celebrity. Americans like to think they're so free, but they keep worshiping these celebrities. Do you know RFK personally? I sure don't. And frankly, no matter how likeable they may seem, I don't trust millionaires. They are people who have benefited from our current system, and therefore, have no incentive to make any real changes in it. They'll only make superficial changes to the system so that they can continue to benefit from it. That's why they love it when people hang "Black Lives Matter" signs on their windows. How nice. But what does hanging up a sign actually do to help black people, poor people or working class people? Nothing. No real change there--just a superficial act of virtual signaling and a massage to one's ego (i.e., 'I'm such a good person, 'cuz I think Black Lives Matter... blah blah blah...')
Honestly, I don't know why people continue to think that some wealthy, privileged guy is going to save them. Why do people keep falling for that? Again, it's nothing personal against RFK. He seems likeable. But so what? I've lived in Hollyweird, studied acting there, and believe me, there are lots of people who are very highly skilled at making themselves appear to be the nicest, kindest people you'd ever meet, but guess what? They aren't. (Consider Bill Cosby, et al.)
RFK Jr is a hypocrite who supports and continues to elevate the Vaccine Frankenstein who wanted to test Anthrax vaccines on other people's kids, he's running on transparency while hiding the financials of Children's Health Defense. One of my favorite Leftist women has been exposing his hypocrisy, she (Alison McDowell) has all the receipts (as do I on the Robert Malone Anthrax vaccine issue).
Stop dictating to women, especially on their platform, what they can or cannot do. The Patriarchy doesn't rule here, a fearless Mama Bear does.
Aloha Cindy and Husseini. I think you are missing an important opportunity to have the best man in the White House since JFK. Trump? Are you kidding me? Trump Bombed Syria. Trump killed the most like General and very well-liked man in Iran. Trump threw out the nuclear deal in Iran. Trump appointed a GMO pusher to head our agriculture. Trump moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem causing how many deaths including children. I am going to state right out, RFK Jr. is our best hope in a long time. He speaks so eloquently on so many issues you minimize. He wants no New Empire. He says he wants to bring back the Democratic party of his father and uncle. He says he will talk about Covid or Vaccines if anyone asks him about it. He avoids it to attempt to bring folks together in a divisive issue. You end auto immune disease by exposing and ending vaccine mandates. You end GMO food and other toxic foods as much as possible. You Heal the soil with Organic and Regenerative agriculture. Israel is yes, an issue, however there are so many more important issues he addresses. There is more to his Israel stance than meets the eye. My research shows Israel may have had a hand in both his father and uncle's death. Do you think he just might be attempting to stay alive? You have a bit of power in your blog and positions. You are damaging the best chance we have to turn this hell around. Check your own prejudices at the door and open your minds. You are damaging to the solution as I see it.
The only way RFK is getting to the White House is by cab or Uber. You say we are missing something, but, I definitely think you are missing a few things as well,
Demanding? Uncaring of my feelings? Honestly, I hope we can still be friends but I disagree with you about this. I’m not demanding you do anything. Just do you and I’ll do me.
I believe I'm aware of the research you are referring to and do not discount that possibility at all. And clearly, they wouldn't have been the only "hand." If we assume this is true, as well as your assumption of the self-preservation instinct, then isn't this a major built-in compromise to his whole potential presidency? That could apply to other, domestic issues as well? What branch of government was REALLY behind the injection manufacture and rollout? Who did his (apparent) friend Robert Malone have major contracts with? He knows about the MIC/Pentagon role; he's written about it and cites people like Sasha Latypova. But I don't see mass circulation tabloids, networks or the NY Times pumping out headlines and stories about "conspiracy theorist misinformation spreader RFK" accusing the U.S. military of creating dangerous 'vaccines.' And it's surprising there have been so few (any?) major "exposes" of his "sordid past," with drugs and deaths by hanging -- not that they're warranted or even legitimate, but when does the media NOT instinctively drown themselves in this pool? I STILL have changed registration to vote for him in the primary, but will not be dismissive of these or other suspicions, critiques.
Kennedy's stance on israhell is somewhat disappointing and disturbing.
Very
Yes it certainly is, but note my comment just made.
Here we go again...vote for the lesser of two evils. Isn't that what Chomsky touted before the current criminal mafia got elected? Sheesh!
It's just not that hard to be just!
I am so over that voting for lesser of two evils thing. Not sure if I'll even vote again--still debating on it. I literally don't like any of the candidates running.
Many interesting points raised. On accountability for the handling of the "pandemic," I believe other commenters accurately stated that RFK Jr. has publicly been critical of it. For me, the issue is that he peaked in 2021 during the giant Berlin protest and has faded somewhat since, to the point where now he's not a leading voice (as far as I know) aggressively blasting the ramping up of ANOTHER cycle of masking, distancing, injection bullying and/or mandates. This is happening now, in real time, while he's an active candidate. As far as holding Fauci to individual account, he wrote the book on that, but is that the biggest issue? I believe Sam might be underplaying the confirmed or not virus issue. People like Sam, Cindy, probably most here are probably "awake" enough to realize that whether or not there was an actual new, unknown pathogen, everything that followed its "discovery" has been a disastrous tragedy, and the huge majority would have "followed orders" just from the official proclamations and fear porn. But just "knowing" this after the fact seems a little too blase, and potentially dangerous. I look at "The Virus" as somewhat equivalent to the "19 Muslims with box cutters." The direct or proximate causes of their respective "events." Referring to September 2001, we can talk forever about "negligent" security before the event, "negligent" and "inept" procedures and policies after it, "coverups" of faulty, inept and negligent personnel throughout. Etc. That's a different animal than, "There were no 19 Muslims with box cutters" who were the cause in the first place. Same here. If there's a question of what really happened in the first place, then what can be gained in pursuing "we'll never let what we don't know what happened happen again?" I guess I am not truly resigned to the "made in a lab" conclusion after seeing how that has (relatively) quickly gone from sacrilege/blasphemy/unallowable lie and misinformation to "mainstream" acceptance. As for the "unreliable" (putting it mildly) testing, I don't doubt that Sam's "positive" results coincided with his not feeling well. There have been enough public testimonies (athletes, entertainers, etc.) of testing "positive" when they no longer felt unwell, or when they never felt sick at all. The test's coincidentally dead (3-4 months ahead of time) inventor repeatedly said the test was NOT a valid diagnostic tool -- and he said it prominently, contradicting Fauci et al. during the AIDS phenomenon.
Biowarfare... Never worked. Chemical weapons do work. Sasha Latypova covers this well.
If anything, what they claim is biological is really the result of latent toxicity that doesn't kill instantly.
Testing doesn't prove it was caused by a virus. Whatever genetic code patterns they're looking for can happen by getting sick via other means. You know how they say virus genes are a part of our body genes? Bingo... because it's the result of damaged cells with broken DNA etc.
Also, how can one be convinced it is different than the flu? I've had horrible flus as a kid (probably from the doctor checkup 💉) where I was almost hospitalized. I got sick during this crap and yeah my taste was weird, but I also remembered my taste got weird in the past too.
Maybe that's why the predator class is so effective. They hammer the word "novel" coronavirus and people are convinced it's something new.
Sorry Sam, the death rates were no different in 2020 vs past years in most nations. Also, what kind of new engineered thing has an average age of death above the life expectancy? Oh yeah, remdesevir and ventilators .... 😂
I don't see how rfk is not addressing the pandemic.... He's addressing health in general in order to point out the reason why we are in this mess.
Not saying he's anti vax is smart because like Aaron Siri says, show us a safe vaccine by the proper trial data.... There's none. But it's a great way to lead in as someone who lets the people see the truth from the machine itself. The ones convinced about safe vaccines will have to face the reality from the captured agencies own lack of proof lol.
Ending autoimmune disease... just stop vaccinations. That's why he brings up safety testing. If it's not proven safe, it's ended. Simple. No new laws needed, because they violated the 86 nvic act by not filing safety reports.
Sam, you sound like you're brainwashed. Fixing the healthcare system doesn't require forcing people to stop smoking or stop eating big macs etc. It just requires following the laws, stopping false claims and shady practices that are allowed of the full of bullshit that doctors, food companies, and big pharma industries. Even if the people still smoke or eat big macs, at least it'll have the fraction of toxic crap it has today if they had to follow basic health and safety... not this known crooked system that ignores it's own regulations.
I do agree with Sam and you about the middle east. Rfk sounds straight up brainwashed by his own culture to believe that nation is innocent at all costs. It's quite odd from a man that's been pretty open minded to learn that shots cause the big A, or that the 3 letter agency killed his uncle and likely his father.
I’m just bummed that there may not be any decent candidates that could win. It’s always a choice between Curly and Shemp except neither is funny.
Personally, I think that we can't rely on any politicians. We, the people, need to come together and create change. Change needs to come from the bottom, from us. No hero is going to save us.
100%
Oy. I'm in the ER now for the second time in 24 hours.
Oh no! Take care!
Great interview! I hope you will have him on again. I just read the transcript, and it seemed to end too soon... I guess I'm desperate for this kind of conversation. Right now, I'm trying to talk to "Covidian cult members," i.e., my friends who think I'm a conspiracy theorist... But they're nice people--too nice and too naive. So I don't try to convince them that there was a scamdemic anymore. I try talking with them about other things, like mass surveillance, 5G radiation, endless war, economic inequality, etc. Often I can find common ground that way.
As far as whether or not the virus exists, I too had strange symptoms over a year ago. But after learning more about 5G, I've been intrigued to discover that the symptoms of 5G radiation exposure are the same as the Covid symptoms. Hmm... Also during lockdowns, there was a massive effort to erect those 5G towers, and they're all over the country now, even in rural areas!
So my own opinion--could be right/could be wrong--is that "Covid" was actually environmentally induced, not from a virus but from emf's or maybe directed energy weapons. May sound crazy to some, but when you look into the effects of emf's you'll maybe see my point.
Also cases of the flu have magically disappeared since the scamdemic, so... was it just a strain of the flu, perhaps augmented by excess emf radiation?
But in any case, there's no point in arguing whether the virus exists or not. We need to find a way to bring people together and see that the richest of the rich are turning the whole world into a prison. They're turning a shopping mall outside of Buffalo, NY into a living center--sort of a manufactured village. My guess is it'll be a "smart" village.
Anyone who fails to see the enormous personal courage RFK Jr. has demonstrated, given his family's history and his bold stands on several vital issues, is too cynical for me.Yes, there are some things where we would like him to be even bolder, and that may evolve as he learns more and the campaign advances. But those who raise scathing criticisms are essentially saying we have to vote for Mr. Awful or Mr. Terrible or some lessers of little note. Right now he is the best VIABLE candidate we have.
I am not sure what "personal courage" has to do with anything? And are YOU really bringing up to ME that if we don't vote for Kennedy then we HAVE to vote for Biden or Trump? Are YOU really making that argument after all your years of Green Party activism? "Cynical" means: I am uncomfortable with confronting your principles, so I just don't want to hear them. Jon, I have heard these EXACT same arguments since I didn't fall for the Obama mystique, then Hillary, then Biden. Oh, and also Sanders. I won't be shamed or blamed for expressing different opinions to anyones. I am not cynical, I am a realist---and if YOU admire personal courage so much, what about mine? Does my courage in losing a son, then battling the very Empire that Bobby and his family are part of count for anything. Can't I state an opinion, or have guests, because I have a lot of "personal courage" without being called names? I don't give a rats ass who anyone votes for, or doesn't vote for--if my content offends you, then don't read it, or listen to it. It's as simple as that. Oh, by the way, my "personal courage" was never backed by the safety net of tens of millions of dollars in the bank, or by a family with unlimited funds (and scandals). I was never a heroin addict, even after all of the terrible things that happened to me. So, really "personal courage." Um, okay.
Oh Wow Cindy! I was referencing Sam's comment. Of course I know your tragic story very well and have respected you for years. Of course personal courage counts, yours as well as Kennedy's. As I have been saying, the choice "they" offer to us is between Mr. Awful and Mr. Terrible, but of course we can vote for others who will likely not even get 5%, which is what I have been doing for years. But the reality is that if Kennedy is not on the ballot, we will continue down this suicidal path. He may be able to at least shift direction.
Obama, Biden,and Sanders were still within the imperial orbit. RFK, Jr, takes inspiration from JFK's intent to "Break the CIA into 1000 pieces and scatter it to the wind." Very different from the sheepdogs. I don't buy you "definition" of cynical, Cindy, and if what I wrote offended you, I deeply apologize. Not my intent at all. As you know from prior comments, we are mostly on the same. page. With respect and aloha always, Jon
Can you explain to me a strategy that will do anything BUT demolish Kennedy's campaign--forgetting all of the terrible things/scandals ALL those major Kennedys (including Jr) have been involved in? Where do you see this going? Are you, and many others, wearing Rose Colored glasses and having nostalgia for a different time that wasn't all that rosy anyway? I would really like someone to explain it adequately to me without name calling. So far, on this thread it's been "cynical" and "harsh" and "divisive."
OK, Thanks for this invitation. We rarely know consequences in advance. We can AIM,with intent,and that is what he is doing. He has said he wants military bases dismantled and a retreat from Empire America to become a respected country. I honor that. His campaign can help defeat the cynicism that is APPROPRIATE regarding the current state of affairs, but on the other side acts to stifle the civic upheaval necessary to make real change. As I have often said, "Despair is not a wining strategy." Same with cynicism, which has the positive side of demonstrating lack of trust in those who claim to "lead" us, but negative like mud that prevents forward motion. Look at the call to occupy Zuccotti Park a dozen years ago! Who knew that it would inspire a worldwide movement or resistance to empire? Here's a gy who is making 9/11 and covid truths the centerpiece of his campaign--and just doing that enters them into the campaign mix of concepts.
https://emanuelpastreich24.org/ My aloha, Jon
No one can articulate how RFK is actually going to win, not even RFk. That is a huge problem. He seemed pretty much in despair when he FINALLY realized the DNC is garbage.
I think focusing on US electoral politics is a losing strategy and prevents us in the working-poor classes to organize a revolutionary strategy for change. And, this thread has once again proven Sam's assertion.
Yes, it has finally sunk in how terribly corrupt DNC is, so he will have to run 3rd party or Independent, and he can draw on disaffected folks for the corporate parties but especially those of he 40% who are not aligned with either Demagogues or Repugnants.
Honestly, it doesn't make any difference who we vote for. Even if RFK should be "picked" by the Dems--out of desperation--he would be controlled by the MIC. If he tried to do anything different he would get the same treatment as his father and uncle. Haven't we learned that by now???
Also, people act like they want their favorite candidate to be tyrants. For example, absent tyranny of some sort, how will Bobby "end autoimmune diseases?"
Cindy, I share your blog at times. I worked with you in Texas, the tour to DC and in DC. I will not share this as I think you both are stuck in your own prejudices and are damaging the best chance this country has to end the living hell around us. If you can't support RFK Jr., then just keep quiet and stop damaging his chances. Trump is a sick child in a 76-year-old body. For God's sake can't you see this?
What makes you think I support Trump and, thanks for all your prior support, but I really don’t appreciate being told what to do
Then quit using your platform to tell others what to do. You do that in your harsh negative comments.
I never tell anyone what to do.
And, yes, this is my platform. Not yours. Not RFK's. Not Trump's. Mine.
If it is not meeting your high requirements, then you are free to leave.
It would be dumb to leave, but that's totally up to you. No one is forcing you to be here, and no one is forcing you to vote, or not vote, for anybody.
I don't think advising Cindy to "keep quiet" on her own site is a winning strategy, amigo.
But he says that I am "harsh?"
RFK says a lot of good things. I listened to him a lot back in 2020, and his book about Fauci helped me to get others to "wake up." However, he isn't going to save us. No politician is at this point. We, the people, need to come together and find solutions and stop looking up to these heroes to save us. I like a lot of what RFK says (except about Israel, of course) but essentially, he is just another millionaire celebrity. Americans like to think they're so free, but they keep worshiping these celebrities. Do you know RFK personally? I sure don't. And frankly, no matter how likeable they may seem, I don't trust millionaires. They are people who have benefited from our current system, and therefore, have no incentive to make any real changes in it. They'll only make superficial changes to the system so that they can continue to benefit from it. That's why they love it when people hang "Black Lives Matter" signs on their windows. How nice. But what does hanging up a sign actually do to help black people, poor people or working class people? Nothing. No real change there--just a superficial act of virtual signaling and a massage to one's ego (i.e., 'I'm such a good person, 'cuz I think Black Lives Matter... blah blah blah...')
Honestly, I don't know why people continue to think that some wealthy, privileged guy is going to save them. Why do people keep falling for that? Again, it's nothing personal against RFK. He seems likeable. But so what? I've lived in Hollyweird, studied acting there, and believe me, there are lots of people who are very highly skilled at making themselves appear to be the nicest, kindest people you'd ever meet, but guess what? They aren't. (Consider Bill Cosby, et al.)
RFK Jr is a hypocrite who supports and continues to elevate the Vaccine Frankenstein who wanted to test Anthrax vaccines on other people's kids, he's running on transparency while hiding the financials of Children's Health Defense. One of my favorite Leftist women has been exposing his hypocrisy, she (Alison McDowell) has all the receipts (as do I on the Robert Malone Anthrax vaccine issue).
Stop dictating to women, especially on their platform, what they can or cannot do. The Patriarchy doesn't rule here, a fearless Mama Bear does.
thank you!
Excellent interview. It really helps to put this present political climate in the right prospective.
Thx!
Hi, thanks. Yes I have had Sam on quite a bit.
Aloha Cindy and Husseini. I think you are missing an important opportunity to have the best man in the White House since JFK. Trump? Are you kidding me? Trump Bombed Syria. Trump killed the most like General and very well-liked man in Iran. Trump threw out the nuclear deal in Iran. Trump appointed a GMO pusher to head our agriculture. Trump moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem causing how many deaths including children. I am going to state right out, RFK Jr. is our best hope in a long time. He speaks so eloquently on so many issues you minimize. He wants no New Empire. He says he wants to bring back the Democratic party of his father and uncle. He says he will talk about Covid or Vaccines if anyone asks him about it. He avoids it to attempt to bring folks together in a divisive issue. You end auto immune disease by exposing and ending vaccine mandates. You end GMO food and other toxic foods as much as possible. You Heal the soil with Organic and Regenerative agriculture. Israel is yes, an issue, however there are so many more important issues he addresses. There is more to his Israel stance than meets the eye. My research shows Israel may have had a hand in both his father and uncle's death. Do you think he just might be attempting to stay alive? You have a bit of power in your blog and positions. You are damaging the best chance we have to turn this hell around. Check your own prejudices at the door and open your minds. You are damaging to the solution as I see it.
Who wants Trump?
The only way RFK is getting to the White House is by cab or Uber. You say we are missing something, but, I definitely think you are missing a few things as well,
Thanks for the comment.
Pretty harsh comment. You may want to reflect on your harshness. This is the kind of Harshness and divisiveness RFK Jr. is working to really heal.
Was your comment not harsh?
Demanding? Uncaring of my feelings? Honestly, I hope we can still be friends but I disagree with you about this. I’m not demanding you do anything. Just do you and I’ll do me.
Do you even realize that you’re proving Sam’s assertion?
I believe I'm aware of the research you are referring to and do not discount that possibility at all. And clearly, they wouldn't have been the only "hand." If we assume this is true, as well as your assumption of the self-preservation instinct, then isn't this a major built-in compromise to his whole potential presidency? That could apply to other, domestic issues as well? What branch of government was REALLY behind the injection manufacture and rollout? Who did his (apparent) friend Robert Malone have major contracts with? He knows about the MIC/Pentagon role; he's written about it and cites people like Sasha Latypova. But I don't see mass circulation tabloids, networks or the NY Times pumping out headlines and stories about "conspiracy theorist misinformation spreader RFK" accusing the U.S. military of creating dangerous 'vaccines.' And it's surprising there have been so few (any?) major "exposes" of his "sordid past," with drugs and deaths by hanging -- not that they're warranted or even legitimate, but when does the media NOT instinctively drown themselves in this pool? I STILL have changed registration to vote for him in the primary, but will not be dismissive of these or other suspicions, critiques.