FROM 1896
It’s Hump Day!
Dear Readers/Subscribers/Friends
As most of you know, I was never in favor of RFKJ running for president for a variety of reasons. Primarily it was because of his unwavering support of the violent, Zionist, illegitimate state of Israel, I did have a smidgen of hope for his appointment as Secretary of Health and Human Services.
That’s what I get for allowing myself to dare “hope.” However, many of his rabid supporters are very upset about the latest approval of an untested mRNA gene therapy injection. Here is his decree by Tweet:
Conversation
Follow
I want to address those of you who have anxieties about
’s limited approval of a new mRNA COVID vaccine for high-risk populations. Moderna has agreed to a true placebo-controlled trial of the new vaccine, which is similar to the existing mRNA vaccine but uses a smaller protein. The FDA will monitor and collect data throughout the trial for every adverse outcome—not just a table list of expected outcomes. FDA will scrutinize every aspect of the trial. We will deliver on our promise to use gold standard science and common sense.
Sorry, but I don’t trust Moderna; Placebo-Controlled-Trials (PCT) that happen after approval, even if “limited;” the FDA; nor the Secretary of the HHS. Neither do many other people. Here is a representative of the replies to Booby’s tweets:
We are not your guinea pigs.
Follow
There is a good chance the corrupt FDA sweeps any undesirable findings under the rug and gives this abomination the green light nonetheless. I don't trust the process and I damn sure don't trust Moderna.
Common sense is not getting the shot at all.
Here is something I had to say on the vax/scamdemic dealy-bobber three years ago:
A Pox on Your Poxes
Thank you for reading Cindy Sheehan's Soapbox Newsletter. This post is public so feel free to share it.
Cindy’s Snail Mail addy:
PO Box 5342
Vacaville CA 95696
Click the image to make a donation via PayPal
If you prefer Venmo: @Cindy-Sheehan-2
@Seattle Keith: re: the new saRNA vaxx- "On May 31st, the FDA announced its approval of Moderna’s new COVID-19 vaccine, mNexspike, a self-amplifying mRNA (saRNA) product authorized for use in individuals 12 years and older with at least one risk factor, and for all adults over 65. On its surface, this approval might seem like just another iteration in the long sequence of pandemic-era decisions. In reality, it marks a sharp pivot in platform regulatory precedent—a pivot that will almost certainly face future regulatory scrutiny as the consequences of this decision unfold.
What distinguishes mNexspike is not merely its antigen target or dosage—it is the platform leap. Self-amplifying mRNA is an entirely different molecular system than first-generation mRNA shots. Its capacity to replicate inside cells confers both heightened expression and prolonged presence of synthetic RNA. That is not an incremental modification; it is a structural transformation. Yet, the FDA approved this product not as a new platform, but through an equivalence framework that compares it only to Spikevax, Moderna’s existing COVID-19 shot.
This approach—comparator trial without placebo control, using a non-inert reference product—should raise eyebrows. It raises scientific, ethical, and procedural questions that will almost certainly attract policy-level attention as standards evolve and expectations of transparency rise." (Dr. James Lyons-Weller) https://www.globalresearch.ca/moderna-mnexspike-approval/5889300
That’s the same FDA that tried to put the release of Pfizer vaccine data on ice for 75 years. So where is Dr Malarkey [sic] on this?